Thread:NeoSuperior/@comment-32769624-20190601201030/@comment-30594379-20191231090024

Sharing my thoughts/POV as a fellow admin and wiki editor, as well as the one that started the original naming scheme for LN volume articles.

If it's just a matter of renaming pages, then I don't think it's a problem. Redirects exist for these reasons. Light Novel Volume 1 can be the main title, with Empowerment as a redirect. The LN pages can still double as an arc page, and you can keep the format you introduced in the first appearance/debut sections.

The main reason I created LN page titles as they were was to differentiate between LN and manga volumes (e.g. Light Novel Volume 1 and Manga Volume 1). Some wikis used similar methods, so I figured I could apply those here.

When it became apparent that WN and LN content had some major differences, the original arc pages were marked as WN exclusive. Instead of creating new arc pages for the LN, the volume pages were used instead. This seemed fine to me; some wikis also use LN volumes as arc pages.

To be honest, I wasn't expecting the pages to be renamed. But they have redirects and categories, and are also linked in some navboxes, so I thought it wasn't a big deal. Then I saw this thread.

To reiterate, I'm in favor of renaming the pages back to their original titles, provided that the contents are left alone.

Something to note is that Fandom's Best Practices sort of recommends using these titles. From Articles on Fandom: Page names should be as close as possible to the typical search term for a reader's intent. A page name for an episode should be that episode's title, rather than the episode's number or production code. However, these codes can be placed somewhere in the article (usually in the infobox).

Not sure how this applies to our situation, but it's something to keep in mind.